Conspiracy Theories and their popularity in Muslim WorldBy Shahnawaz FarooqiConspiracy-Theories-and-their-popularity-in-Muslim-World.pdf
Why Read write and share the knowledge is important
A poor guy lives very near to earth and he wishes ALLAH keep him blessed always as he will be in lose of times if he will get away. He fear that always and always tries to purify his heart and soul. Those who want to close to ALLAH do not think of worldly things or object or see the appearance of things rather looking for the theme and inner and soul of all.
And sometimes we use to thing why we cover or we are suppose to cover?
Every creatures is covered in their own fashion by Creator
We have an idea of how as all of them looks so complete in ways of creativity and perfection is their existence.
Start from a tree or a cell or Atom all are shielded and similarly When Man or Adam Peace by upon him sent down to earth was blessed with cover or dress and that dress was eventually the perfect one to cover well. and look modest.
And covering properly is a shield and like protecting from dust,sun and people bad ways and stares.
Look if u see an open paper out of the notebook and let everyone write everyone will write of no use. But if that paper is protected in hard coated book everyone will try to write the best on that paper. As well that paper belongs and shielded in that hard cover that all can never cross.
You can imagine many example simple and complex to understand.
like we like things and sweets properly covered/packed and protected as well their outer and their inner. like a sweet a cake or anything or object and few we like open and fresh.
Similarly human being men and women outer and inner both must be modest and covered properly as it always looks good as well it feels and soothe and satisfies us. Nature lead us to sooth and satisfaction as Nature itself the creature of God.
That is the reason and understand those object, things and orders or words or commandments all are for goodness and betterment of humankind.
As to word of ALLAH and Holy Quran is independent of variables like Times and place and people.
One Message for all.
O People who believe
People who believe
People who understand
People who want to see
People who want to seek
People who are in search of truth
People who want to learn
People who want to gain knowledge and wisdom
People who want to be blessed with blessings from God/ALLAH.
There are so much to earn with simple and complex examples for people who want to understand and who want to be on right track/path and who need soothe and satisfaction who have to eventually join the way of ALLAH and that way comes from the knowledge of Holy Quran.
As a very simple understanding all souls are created together and sent to earth on different times and in different people for a purpose and that was Holy Quran very first word. Read and Read with the name of Lord/Creator. Who created human with clot. and later write with pen. as translation quoted below.
Surat Al-`Alaq (The Clot)
Recite in the name of your Lord who created
Created man from a clinging substance.
Recite, and your Lord is the most Generous
Who taught by the pen
Taught man that which he knew not.
No! [But] indeed, man transgresses
Because he sees himself self-sufficient.
Indeed, to your Lord is the return.
Reading and seeking and all those who do both these are blessed with the
Straight path said in Surat Al-Fātiĥah
Guide us to the straight path
All human being on way or another have to read, write and seek and excel for this path and the people who know all these skills have a greater responsibility to let the people know the knowledge they have.
As a matter of understanding our knowledge is not our ability nor our appearances as well our profession and skills we have. So we can not and can never judge people along us like colleague and co-workers.
As a matter of understanding this is not zenith or climax of human to do compare him/her to others or get jealous or TO JUDGE as faith and simple reality we are not the judge and this is not our task and core responsibility to perform.
The is only one thing that can be of a matter to be proud but still that one thing is not and can never be arguable or measurable by any man that who is more close to GOD unless ALLAH said HIMSELF to human.
So as this is the climax and level of elegance or greatness for a human and non of us can say about him or other who is at what level so here comes an equality of all that is brotherhood and that explains us same rights for all as matter of understanding all humanity parent is ADAM and EVE Peace be upon them and ALLAH created them.
It is He who created for you all of that which is on the earth. Then He directed Himself to the heaven, [His being above all creation], and made them seven heavens, and He is Knowing of all things.
And He taught Adam the names – all of them. Then He showed them to the angels and said, “Inform Me of the names of these, if you are truthful.”
They said, “Exalted are You; we have no knowledge except what You have taught us. Indeed, it is You who is the Knowing, the Wise.”
He said, “O Adam, inform them of their names.” And when he had informed
them of their names, He said, “Did I not tell you that I know the unseen [aspects] of the heavens and the earth? And I know what you reveal and what you have concealed.”
And [mention] when We said to the angels, “Prostrate before Adam”; so they prostrated, except for Iblees. He refused and was arrogant and became of the disbelievers.
And We said, “O Adam, dwell, you and your wife, in Paradise and eat therefrom in [ease and] abundance from wherever you will. But do not approach this tree, lest you be among the wrongdoers.”
But Satan caused them to slip out of it and removed them from that [condition] in which they had been. And We said, “Go down, [all of you], as enemies to one another, and you will have upon the earth a place of settlement and provision for a time.”
Then Adam received from his Lord [some] words, and He accepted his repentance. Indeed, it is He who is the Accepting of repentance, the Merciful.
We said, “Go down from it, all of you. And when guidance comes to you from Me, whoever follows My guidance – there will be no fear concerning them, nor will they grieve.
And those who disbelieve and deny Our signs – those will be companions of the Fire; they will abide therein eternally.”
This is Why Read write and share the knowledge is important and this is who we are all brothers and sisters and equal and this is about Adam and Eve(Hawa) Peace Be Upon Them.
11/3/2012 – Science Education – Article Ref: MI1211-5319
Number of comments:
By: Abdesselam Cheddadi
The Message of Islam* –
At first sight, the place held by education in Ibn Khaldun’s sociology appears uncertain to say the least. What today we understand by the term ‘education’-the replication of individuals and groups, firstly at the level of values and secondly at that of knowledge and know-how-is found in the Muqaddima only in a scattered and incomplete fashion, in an order and pattern whose meaning escapes us at first sight. More important, Ibn Khaldun makes no use of a general concept in speaking of education. This is all the more surprising as he accustoms us elsewhere to a systematic approach to the main phenomena of life in society. However, upon closer view we discover that this ambiguity and these lacunae in fact reflect the state of the Muslim system of education, and we are forced to admit that, in this field as in many others connected with the knowledge of Muslim society, Khaldun’s contribution is the most complete at our disposal.
The education system in Muslim societies
The education system in Muslim societies was without a doubt one of the most extensive and most developed of all those prevailing in pre-industrial societies, which was due to the very nature of Muslim society itself. Compared to agro-literate societies contemporary with it, Muslim society stands out for its more flexible and less hierarchically organized structures. The body composed of scholars and the literati was open, non-centralized, non-hereditary, non-exclusive, with a fluid organization that implied no formal hierarchy,3 thus giving rise to a relatively broad education and teaching system that in many ways prefigured our modern systems.4
Like the society itself, the education system was both segmented and unified. It was a reflection of the profound separation between the rural and urban worlds: agrarian or agro-pastoral communities of peasants and stock-breeders on the one hand, and an urban society of merchants, artisans, clerics and State civil servants on the other. And, at the same time, it was unified by the common adherence to Islam, identification with which was tangibly represented by the universal Koranic teaching that was virtually obligatory for all. Though education was informal and imparted by the family and the community in rural areas and among the urban poor, there was formal schooling for the children of the mercantile, clerical and political Žlite.
Children were frequently placed under a tutor or received longer, more diversified instruction in a school that went well beyond the teaching of the Koran and the rules of religious practice. Independently of this education of children and without any structural connection between the two, there was also vocational teaching to prepare the learned for various professions. Theoretically available to all, covering all fields of knowledge both ancient and Muslim, homogeneous in its methods, it came to form part of institutions only on a partial basis and at a late date.5 It is within this educational setting that the madrasa (college), the model of the medieval university in France and Italy and of the English ‘college’6-which was later to give rise to the modern university-came into being. This basic education, religious above all, and this system of the replication of scholars, was paralleled by what could be called a system of general adult instruction. In Islamic thought, education, which here takes in religion and morals, is a process that ends at no determined stage or age but lasts an entire lifetime, as expressed in the saying attributed to the prophet Muhammad: ‘Learn science from the cradle to the grave’. Such figures as that of the literate man (adib), the pious man, the fakir or dervish, and that of the burgher or governor consorting with the learned, so typical of Muslim society, owed a great deal to this system of general instruction based on such institutions as the mosque or the zaouia, and carried forward by such people as the sermon-writer (khatib, wa iz), the poet, the religious reformer or the saint, and by a vast literature of popularizations made up of literary anthologies, encyclopedias, local or general histories, biographical dictionaries, pious works, mystical treatises, etc.
The educational and cultural Islamic system led to the production of an abundant literature setting forth its organization and functioning, analyzing its standards and values. Philosophers such as al-Farabi7 and Miskawayh8 proposed a theory of education whose end was to allow human beings to reach the perfection proper to their nature. At another level, al-Mawardi9 proposed an education program reconciling worldly and religious interests, and al-Ghazali,10 in his celebrated Ihya’ ulum al-din [The Revival of the Religious Sciences], formulated a theoretical basis and devised a practical method for attaining the religious ideal of the good Muslim. All these educational theories, in line with a tradition that goes back to Graeco-Roman antiquity, are interested in the human being per se, considered in every aspect of his or her being. They do not concentrate on a particular stage of human life or a particular type of instruction or institution; they lay down a number of fundamental educational principles, though in a subsidiary and cursory manner: the restrained use of authority and corporal punishment, the need to awaken the child’s interest, the value of example, and progression in learning. Above all, they insist on the importance of the pedagogical relationship and define the respective roles and duties of master and student.
Thus, in Islamic thought education was perceived as a matter that, during infancy, devolved upon the family, especially the father, whereas in adulthood it became the individual’s own responsibility. Yet no clear awareness of a unified system of education as a fundamental component of the social system bringing together all aspects of the replication of individuals and groups had come into being. The accent was placed rather on the individual soul, which had to be corrected (taqwim), improved (tahdhib), reformed (islah) and healed of its sickness (mudawat). General concepts such as ta’dib (educate) or talim (instruct) concerned individuals and comprised acts or relations involving person-to-person relationships. There was no generic term designating education as a social institution or the education system as a set of institutions, practices and items of knowledge, which in any case was not specific to Muslim society. Such a concept, together with the reality behind it, is closely linked to the emergence of modern nations and States, one of whose principal duties is in fact to manage and develop education.11
THE REPRODUCTION OF VALUES
Faithful to the general position he takes in the Muqaddima, that of a ‘science of human society’, (ilm al-ijtima al-insani), Ibn Khaldun approaches education neither as a philosopher, a religious thinker, a moralist nor as a jurist-the four approaches adopted by Muslim thinkers who considered the phenomenon of education-but as a sociologist and historian. Yet, while his approach faithfully reflects the fundamental structural features of the Islamic education system (separation of the rural world from the urban world, discontinuity between the training of the person and training for a trade, and the cowardly and badly structured character of educational institutions), it does not apprehend the education system as forming a whole. The aspects of education that we would today classify under the reproduction of values are scattered throughout those chapters of the Muqaddima devoted to social organization and dynamics, power, and rural and urban ways of life. On the other hand, the aspects involving training, knowledge and know-how are brought together in the two successive chapters dealing with the arts and sciences.
The well-known concept of asabiyya, generally rendered as esprit de corps, solidarity or cohesion, is rarely seen other than from the sociological standpoint. But it also has to do with the world of values. It may even be said that this concept is the underlying value in tribal society, as it is the source of all forms of cohesion in a society organized according to an interlocking principle. The foundations of asabiyya are what Ibn Khaldun calls nura (kinship), the feeling of affection for and attachment to close relatives and all who are of the same blood.12
When a relative suffers an injustice or is attacked one feels humiliated and leaps to his or her defense in the same natural reflex that causes one to reciprocate aggression against oneself. Ibn Khaldun calls it a natural tendency that has always existed in human beings. It transmits itself spontaneously from one generation to the next and needs to be neither learned nor taught. It is to be found at the deepest level of a sort of instinct of preservation. But Ibn Khaldun admits that the relations that people are forced to maintain between themselves out of vital necessity are orderly and obey rules and laws. One of the functions of thought is to ‘allow people to acquire, through their dealings with their fellows, knowledge of what they must do and what they must not do, of what is good and what is evil’.13
Thanks to ’empirical intelligence’ individuals are capable of discovering for themselves the rules and values that must guide their acts and their social life; but, as Ibn Khaldun points out, this would take too much time, ‘as everything that depends on experience requires time’.14 A much shorter way lies in imitating one’s parents, teachers and elders in general. Ibn Khaldun thus poses the problem of the reproduction of values at the most general level, placing himself at the point of view of the individual, however, not that of society, without considering the social function of the reproduction of values as such. He fails here to disengage himself from a general attitude we find in philosophers, religious thinkers and moralists, one that might be called ‘edifying’.
Individual improvement and salvation are the aims here, requiring the acquisition of certain forms of behavior and the assimilation of certain rules and values. Ibn Khaldun does not state exactly which ones, but it can safely be affirmed that he means here what Muslim thinkers commonly call the adab, ways of doing, social conventions or rules of behavior. The adab reach into all fields of human activities and behavior. They have been codified down to the smallest details, as can be seen in al-Mawardi and al-Ghazali, forming a part of that broad, permanent moral and religious mechanism for human education referred to above.
In other respects, Ibn Khaldun adopts an approach that could without hesitation be described as sociological. It can be illustrated by three examples-examples in which he analyses the courage of rural folk, the corruption of urban dwellers and the phenomenon of imitation.
Courage is a cardinal virtue among country people, he observes. They have neither militia nor walls nor gates. They see to their own defense, bearing arms and keeping themselves on the alert at all times. In them, therefore, ‘daring has become a character trait, and courage second nature’. Among townsmen, however, this virtue is nearly absent since they are brought up in a state of dependence, sheltered behind their walls and protected by their militia and their governors; they are used to peace and comfort. In addition, their spirits are weakened and their courage annihilated by the weight of the constraints imposed on them by ‘governmental and educational laws’.15
Corrupt morals are virtually inescapable for urban dwellers. An affluent life leads to the search for pleasure, the appearance of new habits and of new needs. These become increasingly difficult to satisfy, particularly when dynasties decline and taxes become heavier. Townspeople use any means, good or bad, to cope, ineluctably entering ‘the ways of immorality’.16 In rural areas, on the other hand, a life of making do with necessities constantly calls for control over appetites. The vices and defects that can be acquired are few compared to those of townspeople, and country people remain close to their original natural state and are more inclined to good.17
Imitation is held by Ibn Khaldun to be a general phenomenon: the dominated always imitate those who dominate them. This is true of children vis-ˆ-vis their parents, pupils vis-ˆ-vis their teachers, subjects vis-ˆ-vis their princes and dominated nations vis-ˆ-vis dominant nations; it holds true as much for custom and behavior as for all aspects of civilization. Ibn Khaldun finds the explanation for this phenomenon in the fact that the dominated believe in the perfection of those who dominate them.18
In all three examples the question of values and their transmission is no longer presented as an exclusively individual matter. The courage of rural folk, like the corrupted morals of townspeople and the phenomenon of imitation, do not depend only on subjective will, nor are they the result of incitement: they are the outcome of actual conditions.
As can be seen, without stating the matter explicitly or systematically, Ibn Khaldun deals with all aspects of the reproduction of values in Muslim society. He begins by assuming, in a sort of philosophical anthropological postulate, that human beings, who are endowed with the faculty of thought, organize their relations with the world and each other according to laws and rules that each individual learns through his or her own personal experience, and especially by impregnation from the family and cultural milieu. At the same time, he reveals deeper values, connected with the very functioning of society, whose reproduction occurs independently of individual wills.
Lastly, it is important to note that Ibn Khaldun brings up twice, although both times in an incidental manner, the matter of the inculcation of religious values. Speaking of the consequences of Koranic instruction on mental development, he points out that it has become ‘the symbol of Islam in all Muslim cities’, as it allows articles of faith to be inculcated in the heart of the child from the tenderest age. In his analysis of the methods practiced in the various regions of the Muslim world he stresses the ‘total’ linguistic ‘deficiency’ to which precocious Koranic instruction leads, particularly when it is unique and exclusive, as it was in the North Africa.
He approves, at least in theory, of the reforms proposed by Abu Bakr Ibn al-Arabi, whereby the child would first be taught language and the rules of calculation, but he finds that such ideas clash with habits too deeply ingrained to allow those ideas to be implemented,19 thereby confirming one of the structural features of the Islamic education system, namely that of the basically religious nature of the instruction given to children and of the discontinuity between that instruction and the training of scholars.
Moreover, when examining the matter of faith and works in the chapter he devotes to theology, Ibn Khaldun gives a personal interpretation of it based on his theory of habitus (malaka, see ‘Learning the Arts’ below). In substance, he says that what is required in faith and works is not just a formal declaration or mechanical gesture but a ‘knowledge of state’, a ‘permanent disposition’, an ‘indelible coloring’ of the soul.20 The essential task of the religious institution is to lead the individual towards such a realization. Ibn Khaldun leaves it up to men of religion to determine and describe the exact practical rules and procedures.
TRAINING IN KNOWLEDGE AND KNOW-HOW
Ibn Khaldun deals with the learning of trades and the teaching of the sciences in connection with the ‘means of existence’ argument and the general table of the sciences of his time that drawn up in the last and very long chapter of the Muqaddima. It is not certain that he would agree with our reconciliation of the two, since he sees technology as a field of knowledge and of thought linked to action and consequently inferior to science, which is pure speculation.
In Ibn Khaldun’s theory of society the development of the arts (i.e. the trades, in the language of the period) and the sciences corresponds at the human level to the perfection of the spiritual nature and at the social level to the final stage of the gradual transition of society from the rural order to the urban order. The gulf between the rural and urban worlds is perceived as a natural consequence of the passage from the ‘necessary’ to the ‘superfluous’, from the ‘simple’ to the ‘complex’. Rural society, being satisfied with the necessary, cultivates only the simplest of the arts, such as agriculture and weaving; it has no knowledge of writing and the sciences, and though at times some of its members may take an interest in such matters they can never reach perfection.20 In the cities, the arts and sciences develop as production expands and diversifies, as wealth increases and as a taste for the superfluous and luxury comes into being.2
The term art (sina a) is used by Ibn Khaldun in a very wide acceptation, covering even the vocational and practical aspects of scientific activities. The various arts, presented in relation to ‘the means of existence’, are classed according to their uses and their social importance before more systematic exposŽs are made on the main ones. The religious and intellectual offices, such as those of the judge, the mufti or the teacher, are placed on the same level as the other arts considered as ‘means of existence’. But, as Ibn Khaldun points out,23 though these are ‘noble’ as to their ends, they are generally poorly paid.
LEARNING THE ARTS
Ibn Khaldun limits himself here to two remarks: the arts must necessarily be learned from a master; they are highly specialized, and a person who masters one art cannot generally master a second. He does not conceive of technology as a body of knowledge independent of those who possess it. Technique, though understood as something at once practical and intellectual (amr amali fikri), is reduced to a skill that may be learned only by observation and imitation (naql al-mu ayana). Learning itself is seen by Ibn Khaldun as the acquisition of a ‘habitus’ (malaka).
He uses this concept, which for philosophers24 had an essentially moral and intellectual meaning, very widely to cover a vast field going from language to faith, the arts and the sciences. He defines it as ‘a stable quality resulting from a repeated action until its form has taken final shape’.25 Habitus are like gradually formed ‘colors’ of the soul. They take shape when a person is still in his or her ‘state of natural simplicity’. Once the soul acquires a given aptitude it loses its primary simplicity, its readiness weakens and its capacity to assimilate a second aptitude diminishes. We shall return to this important concept later.
THE TEACHING OF THE SCIENCES
The ideas developed by Ibn Khaldun on teaching belong to his encyclopedic presentation of the sciences. This opens with a theory of knowledge and a general presentation of the socio-historical and epistemological bases of scientific development. Then the sciences, categorized as the rational-‘those that people can apprehend by virtue of the very nature of thought’26-and the traditional- ‘those founded upon authority’27-are described as to their subjects, their methods, their results and their historical development. Teaching is approached at the end of this enumeration and before the sections on language, the learning of language and the various forms of literary production. Two sides can be distinguished to Ibn Khaldun’s presentation, one covering the principles of teaching, the other its methods and content. The learning of language is dealt with separately.
CONDITIONS FOR TEACHING
At birth, says Ibn Khaldun, we are entirely devoid of knowledge; we are still no more than ‘raw material’. We then gradually gain ‘form’ ‘thanks to the knowledge we acquire through our organs’. Essentially ignorant, we fulfill ourselves as human beings only through knowledge. Ibn Khaldun distinguishes three types of knowledge corresponding to as many ‘degrees of thought’. There is practical knowledge, the product of ‘the discerning intelligence’, which allows us to act in the world in a controlled fashion; then ‘a knowledge of what we must or must not do and of what is good or evil’, which we acquire through our ’empirical intelligence’ and which guides us in our relations with our fellows; and, lastly, theoretical knowledge of everything that exists in the world, which we conquer by our ‘speculative intelligence’. Only this last type of knowledge, the subject of the sciences, gives us the possibility of reaching perfection of soul.28
The teaching of the sciences is necessary for two reasons: firstly, thorough knowledge of them requires a lengthy period of learning that can be carried out only with the help of teachers;29 secondly, their very development requires them to be communicated to others.
Ibn Khaldun’s pedagogical conception is based on the central concept of the habitus, mentioned earlier in connection with the learning of the arts. Whether it concerns the child or the adult, the practical arts or the sciences, moral or religious values, the aim of all pedagogical action is the formation in the soul of a stable disposition. Once it has been acquired, this disposition will not disappear. Ibn Khaldun often compares it to a dye that lasts until the cloth to which it has been applied is destroyed.
All habitus, says Ibn Khaldun, are necessarily corporal. He understands the habitus as something the soul can acquire only through the senses, as opposed to another type of knowledge proper to the prophets and mystics, which can be obtained only through the contemplation by the soul of its own essence. This concerns both the physical and the intellectual aptitudes, starting with the very fact of thinking.30 The formation of a habitus initially requires continuous repetition until the form is fixed. In order to obtain maximum efficiency, it must be a practice (bi-l-mubashara) and modeled on the most perfect exemplars with the help of the best teachers, preferably following methods of direct observation (bi-l-mu ayana). Ibn Khaldun thinks that the soul has but fairly limited receptivity (isti dad).
For one thing, it cannot receive several ‘dyes’ at a time; then, when it has taken on one of these, its capacity to receive others gradually diminishes.31 Training must thus start from the earliest age, when the soul is still virgin, ‘because the first things to be imprinted into hearts are like foundations for the habitus; and the building’s value is determined by that of its foundations’.32 Accordingly, the choice of content in the earliest instruction is of decisive importance. Moreover, in the field of the arts as well as in that of the sciences, Ibn Khaldun advises strictly against the teaching of more than one subject at a time. Moreover, he points out, observation shows us that ‘it is rare to find a person skilled in one art who is then capable of excelling in another and to the same degree’.33
Ibn Khaldun calls attention to another important factor in the formation of habitus, namely that of authority. An overly severe attitude on the part of the teacher leads to the most harmful consequences, particularly for young children. In this connection, he cites the situation of slaves, servants and oppressed nations. Constraint and oppression break the character, sap energy and in the end destroy their subjects’ capacity for realizing ‘their destiny and their full humanity’.34 He therefore recommends moderate use of authority and punishment, taking into consideration the personality of the pupil and the need ‘to instruct without afflicting the pupil and killing his or her spirit’. Finally, habitus can be either good or bad; they may take the form of either virtue or vice, good or evil, good taste or bad, refinement or crudeness, clarity and exactness or confusion. They also differ in degree, depending on the quality of teaching and of the models imitated and on the general level of development of the civilization.
Methods and contents
The question of the teaching of the sciences Ibn Khaldun approaches from his concept of the habitus. In order to master any discipline and fully possess it, he says, it is necessary to acquire ‘a habitus that allows the principles and rules to be grasped, problems to be fully understood and secondary questions to be drawn from principles’.35 The formation of such a habitus demands a rigorous approach in which must be taken into consideration the student’s ‘receptivity’ and power to assimilate, together with the quantity of information contained in the subject to be taught and its complexity. Ibn Khaldun considers that the process must take place in three progressive stages, whose object and means he is careful to explain.36
The first of these is a preparatory stage. Its object is to familiarize the student with the subject being taught and to prepare him or her to grasp its problems. This stage is limited to giving an overall view of the subject and emphasizing its main points. Explanations must be kept simple and general and allow for the student’s capacity for understanding and assimilating. The second stage goes deeper. Now the subject must be looked at from every angle and generalizations transcended. Explanations and commentaries must be exhaustive and all divergent points of view examined. The third stage is that of consolidation and mastery. The subject is again studied, in extensor, from the beginning, but this time the most complex and obscure points are gone into.
Ibn Khaldun lays great emphasis on the principle of the progressive approach. He says it is a serious error to begin by the most abstruse problems, as do many teachers who take no account of the student’s state of preparation. Such a practice is most harmful, as the student tires rapidly and becomes discouraged. Worse still, in the belief that the difficulties encountered are intrinsic to the subject, he or she turns away from and abandons it. Going further into the matter, Ibn Khaldun perceives clearly that the inculcation of a body of knowledge is inseparable from the development of the mental aptitudes necessary for that knowledge to be assimilated. As he points out: ‘At the beginning the student is literally incapable of understanding anything at all, except for a very few points that, in any case, he or she grasps only in an approximate and summary manner, when they are explained with examples drawn from sensory experience. Then the student’s readiness gradually develops: the problems of the subject become more familiar with every repetition, and he or she then goes from approximate knowledge to an ever deeper assimilation’.37
Ibn Khaldun supplements these general principles with a number of practical recommendations. He recommends to teachers that they present their students with consistent teaching material suited to their capacities, keeping to the works selected for the course and seeing to it that they are completely assimilated before passing on to others; not teaching two subjects at the same time, not stretching out the study of a subject over too long a period, in order not to break the interdependence between its different facets. He advises students not to ‘dwell on disputes over words’ and especially not to weigh themselves down with formal logic. ‘Indeed’, he says, ‘the only natural means of attaining truth is the natural readiness to think, once it is relieved of all false ideas and the thinker places his or her entire confidence in divine mercy. Logic is nothing more than a description of the act of thinking and in most cases follows it’.38
On the question of the content of science teaching, Ibn Khaldun limits himself to a few remarks inspired by the actual state of education in his time. He denounces three abuses: the overload of work imposed on students; the excessive importance given to the ‘instrumental sciences’; and the use of prŽcis. The sciences, particularly religious and literary science, had undergone considerable development under Islam, and Ibn Khaldun describes it in detail. In agreement with his contemporaries, he judges this development to have reached its apogee and its term.39 How and in what form should the enormous accumulated corpus be transmitted? During the preceding centuries sustained efforts had been made to devise adequate didactic forms: syntheses, treatises, prŽcis and commentaries.
For each subject there was a plethora of works available. Each school of thought or trend had its own collection, often with methods and terminologies that were peculiar to it. Ibn Khaldun wondered how the average student could be required to assimilate it all. Teachers, he suggests, should limit themselves to teaching their students the subject-matter of their own schools. But he barely believes in this solution himself, ‘owing to force of habit’. PrŽcis do not seem to him to furnish an effective remedy; on the contrary, they only increase the harm done. Intended to ‘facilitate memorization for students, they render the task harder for them’.
Ibn Khaldun makes two reproaches: by trying to ‘fit a maximum number of ideas into a minimum number of words’, they are injurious to the quality of expression and lead to comprehension difficulties; and they sow confusion in the students’ minds ‘by presenting them with the ultimate findings of a subject before preparing them to take in those findings’.40 Faced with such a situation, it is understandable that he should speak out against the propensity of his age to dwell on the study of the sciences described as ‘auxiliary’ or ‘instrumental’-such as grammar, logic and legal principles. These are theoretically only means to be placed at the service of the fundamental sciences that are sought for their own sakes. Thus, philology and arithmetic should serve the religious sciences, while logic and philosophy should be similarly available to theology. Too much time spent on the religious sciences is only further weighing down the burden borne by students and distracting them from the essential.41
This view of education is not seen by Ibn Khaldun as being linked to institutions or places. It appears rather as a private, individual matter at the level of each of its three components: science, teachers and students. The individual soul fulfils itself in and through knowledge. The invention and development of the sciences meets a spiritual necessity above all. Though perfectible, the sciences are conceived as constituting a closed universe, or at least one tending towards a certain completion. The greater part of scientific activity must be devoted to the task of organizing the various fields of knowledge into individualized subjects capable of being transmitted. Thus of the objects assigned by Ibn Khaldun to ‘the composition of works’, five out of eight deal with organization and the transmission of knowledge: definition of the subject, the systematic exposŽ of results, the righting of errors, commentary and summary.42
With the progress of civilization, science became professionalized, organizing itself according to principles and rules, making use of a specialized methodology and terminology; it was practiced as a trade. When Ibn Khaldun attempts to trace out a history of education, he concentrates on the sanad, i.e. the network of teachers, across space and time, who guarantee the quality of the knowledge transmitted. Moreover, the history of the sciences is essentially epitomized for him in that of the basic works that have been composed within each subject, with their main commentaries and abstracts.
Thus on the one hand, and within each subject, there are a number of established works; on the other, chains of authorities to transmit them: this sums up the institution of education. Ibn Khaldun barely mentions such places as colleges (madrasas) or convents (khanqas, rubut), which he considers only in the role of material assistance to students and teachers (board and lodging).43 Thus indirectly, and several centuries in advance, he confirms one of the invariable structural features of the education system in Muslim societies, namely the precarious nature of its institutions.
Source: The Message of Islam – Abdesselam Cheddadi
2. Abdesselam Cheddadi (Morocco). Professor in the Faculty of Educational Sciences at the University Muhammad V, Rabat; former Associate Head of Studies at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris. Translator of the autobiography of Ibn Khaldun under the title Le voyage d’occident et d’orient [The Journey to West and East] (1980), extracts from the Kitab al-Ibar, under the title Peuples et nations du monde [The World’s Peoples and Nations] (2 vols., 1986), and numerous studies on aspects of the thought of Ibn Khaldun. At present preparing a new translation of the Muqaddima and of the History of the Arabs and Berbers of the Maghrib (to be published by Editions Gallimard, Paris).
3 . Cf. E. Gellner, Nations and nationalism, Oxford, Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1983, p. 11-18, 29-35.
4 . Cf. G. Makdisi, The Rise of Colleges, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1981; The Rise of Humanism in Classical Islam and the Christian West, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1990.
5 .See H.J. Cohen, The Economic Background and Secular Occupations of Muslim Jurisprudents and Traditionists in the Classical Period of Islam (until the Middle of the Eleventh Century), J.E.S.H.O., January 1970, p. 16-61; J.E. Gilbert, The Ulama of Medieval Damascus and the International World of Islamic Scholarship, Ph.D. dissertation, Ann Arbor, University Microfilms, 1977.
6 .G. Makdisi, op. cit.
7. See particularly Ara’ ahl al-madina al-fadila [The Opinions of the Inhabitants of the Virtuous City] and Kitab tahsil as-sa ada [The Book of the Attainment of Happiness]. A profile of al-Farabi is included in this series of ‘100 Thinkers on Education’.
8 .See Kitab tahdhib al-akhlaq [The Book of Moral Education].
9 .See Adab ad-dunya wa-d-din [The Rules of Propriety for the Wordly Life and the Religious Life].
10 .A profile of al-Ghazali is included in this series of ‘100 Thinkers on Education’.
11 .E. Gellner, op. cit., p. 35-38.
12 .Cf. Muqaddima Ibn Khaldun, ‘Abd al-Wahid Wafi, Cairo, undated, Vol. II, p. 484-85; French translation by Vincent Monteil, Vol. I, p. 256-58; English translation by F. Rosenthal, Vol. I, p. 264-65, (hereafter designated as Fr. tr. and Engl. tr). All quotations from the Muqaddima given in the present essay were translated from Arabic to French by the author.
13 .Muqaddima, III, p. 1012-13; Fr. tr. II, p. 878-80; Engl. tr. II, p. 417-19.
14 .Ibid., III, p. 1012; Fr. tr., II, p. 878; Engl. tr., II, p. 418.
15 .Ibid., II, p. 478-81; Fr. tr., p. 249-54; Engl. tr., p. 257-61.
16. Ibid., II, p. 888 ff.; Fr. tr., II, p. 765 ff.; Engl. tr., II, p. 291 ff.
17 .Ibid., II, p. 474-79; Fr. tr., I, p. 246-51; Engl. tr., p. 253-58.
18. Ibid., II, p. 510-11; Fr. tr., I, p. 291-92; Engl. tr., p. 290-300.
19 .Ibid., III, p. 1249-53; Fr. tr., p. 1222-26; Engl. tr., III, p. 300-05.
20. Ibid., III, p. 1072 ff.; Fr. tr., III, p. 965 ff.; Engl. tr. III, p. 39 ff.
21 .Ibid., II, p. 935, 961; Fr. tr., p. 816, 847; Engl. tr., II, p. 346, 378.
22 .Ibid., II, p. 936-39; Fr. tr., II, p. 817-19; Engl, tr., II, p. 347-49.
23 .Ibid., II, p. 925-26; Fr. tr., p. 805-07; Engl. tr., p. 334-35.
24 .See Avicenna, for example, in Shifa’.
25. Muqaddima, II, p. 935; Fr. tr., II, p. 816; Engl. tr., II, p. 346.
26 .Ibid., III, p. 1025-26; Fr. tr., II, p. 897; Engl. tr., II, p. 436.
28 .Ibid., III, p. 1008-09; Fr. tr., II, p. 873-75; Engl. tr., II, p. 411-13.
29. Ibid., III, p. 1017-18; Fr. tr., p. 887-88; Engl. tr., II, p. 424-426.
30 .Ibid., III, p. 1019; Fr. tr., II, p. 889; Engl. tr., II, p. 426.
31 .Ibid., II, p. 942; Fr. tr., p. 824-25; Engl. tr., p. 354-55.
32. Ibid., III, p. 1249; Fr. tr., II, p. 1222; Engl. tr., II, p. 301.
33. Ibid., II, p. 942; Fr. tr., p. 824-25; Engl. tr., p. 354-55.
34. Ibid. , III, p. 1253-54; Fr. tr., III, p. 1226-29; Engl. tr., p. 305-07.
35 .Ibid., III, p. 1019; Fr. tr., II, p. 888; Engl. tr., II, p. 426.
36 .Ibid., III, p. 1243-45; Fr. tr., III, p. 1218-21; Engl. tr., III, p. 292-94.
38 .Ibid., III, p. 1248; Engl. tr., p. 298.
39 .Ibid., III, p. 1027; Fr. tr., II, p. 901; Engl. tr., II, p. 439.
40 .Ibid., III, p. 1242; Fr. tr., p. 1217-18; Engl. tr., p. 291.
41 .Ibid., III, p. 1248-49; Engl. tr., p. 298-300.
42 .Ibid., III, p. 1237-40; Fr. tr., III, p. 1211-14; Engl. tr., III, p. 284-88.
43 .Ibid., III, p. 1021, 1025; Fr. tr., II, p. 892, 897; Engl. tr., II, p. 430, 435. Works by Ibn Khaldun
Kitab al-Ibar [The Book of Advice]. Ed. by N. Hurini. 7 vols. Cairo, Bulaq, 1867 (H. 128)
Muqaddima Ibn Khaldun [Ibn Khaldun’s Introduction to History]. 4 vols. Cairo, Abd a-Wahid Wafi, 1957. [The Prolegomena of Ibn Khaldun]. 3 vols. Paris, E. Quatremre, 1858. (In Arabic)
Shifa’ as-sa’il li tahdh ib al-masa’il [Satisfying Questions on the Correction of Problems]. Istanbul, M. Ibn Tawit at-Tanji, 1958.
at-Ta rif bi-Ibn Khaldun wa rihlatuhu gharban wa sharqan [An Introduction to Ibn Khaldun and His Travels in West and East]. Cairo, M. Ibn Tawit at-Tanji, 1951 (H. 1370).
Tarikh ad-duwal al-islamiya bi-l-Maghrib [A History of Islamic Countries in the Maghreb]. Algiers, W.M. de Slane, 1847 (H. 1263).
Les ProlŽgomnes d’Ebn Khaldoun [The Prolegomena of Ibn Khaldun]. Fr. tr. W.M. de Slane. 3 vols. Paris, 1863. Ibn Khaldun: discours sur l’histoire universelle [Ibn Khaldun: a Presentation of Universal History]. Fr. tr. by V.
Monteil. 3 vols. Beirut, 1967.
The Muqaddima: an Introduction to History. Engl. tr. by F. Rosenthal. 3 vols. Princeton, N.J., 1958, new ed. 1967. Nations et peuples du monde [The World’s Nations and Peoples]. Fr. tr. introd. and notes by Abdesselam Cheddadi.
vols. Paris, Sindbad, 1986. (Extracts from the ‘Ibar.)
La voie et la loi ou le ma”tre et le juriste [The Way and the Law of the Master and the Lawyer]. Fr. tr. from Arabic presented and annotated by RenŽ PŽrez. Paris, Sindbad, 1991.
Le voyage d’occident et d’orient : autobiographie [Travels in West and East: an Autobiography]. Fr. tr., introd. and notes by Abdesselam Cheddadi. Paris, Sindbad, 1980.
Works about Ibn Khaldun, education and Islam
Ahmad, A. The Educational Thought of Ibn Khaldun. Journal of the Pakistan Historical Society (Karachi), Vol. XIV, 1968, p. 175-81.
Berque, J., Ville et universitŽ aperu sur l’histoire de l’Ecole de Fs [Town and University: a Glimpse on the History of the Fes School]. Revue historique de droit franais et Žtranger (Paris), 1948-1949, p. 64-117.
Buhs, H. The Educational System of the Muslims in the Middle Ages. Islamic Culture (Hyderabad), Vol. 1, 1927, p. 442-72.
Bulliet, R. The Patricians of Nishapur: a Study in Medieval Islamic Social History. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1972, p. 249-54.
Keddi, N. (ed.). Scholars, Saints and Sufis. Berkeley, Calif., University of California Press, 1972.
Muhasib, J. At-Tarbiya ind Ibn Khaldun [Education according to Ibn Khaldun], al-Mashriq, XLIII, 1949, p. 365-98. Qurayshi, M.A. The Educational Ideas of Ibn Khaldun. Journal of the Maharaja Sayajirao University (Baroda), Vol.
XIV, 1965, p. 83-92.
Sourdel, D.; Makdisi, G. (eds.). L’Enseignement en Islam et en Occident au Moyen Age [Education in the Islamic World and in the West in the Middle Ages]. Revue des Etudes Islamiques (Paris), special issue, Vol. XLIV, 1976.
Tibawi, A. L. Philosophy of Muslim Education. Islamic Quarterly (Hyderabad), Vol. IV, No. 2, 1957, p. 78-89.
The only thing matter to us is Humanity, and stop this genocide and killing so we should raise our voice with all supporting the cause.
O Allah Help us and wake the wealthy and wise Muslims and People with Faith(Emaan) to let them help the world. And help us awake the one good being and may be rest awake themselves. O God raise the people from us and make us strong enough to help the needy in all times
Its not about who is who but its about us. What we are doing is more important than what others doing. We have to answer for us and they have for them. Kindly do your part well and being a good being and good Muslim we should left all to ALLAH as ALLAH knows the best and ALLAH is all knowledge and information. ALLAH is start and ALLAH is end. and Honestly our struggle starts from us for Humanity and all good causes.
Only 97 Signed the petition
Dear all brothers and sisters let us not worry who is who and what is what. Raise your voice or send a boat or rescue the people by any means possibles. If few are sleeping or few our short of resources You can at-least raise your voices as there is a very clear line between right and wrong and distinction and difference. So Please raise your voice so other day someone can raise for you or us. Its not about USA or UN but its about Humanity. If we saved one Human-being we will save all humanity.
Rohingya Muslims from the state of Arakan in Burma.
Since October 21, organized mobs of Rakhine Buddhist extremist headed by fanatic monks declare campaign to wipe out ethnic Rohingya Muslim from their ancestral land of Minbya, Mrauk-U, Pauktaw, kyaukphy and other part of Burma.The local, state and national government of U Thein Sein are supporting crime against humanity to achieve their dream of Muslim free Arakan and Burma.
You may read it further
Kindly sign this petition and do share to all http://www.change.org/petitions/us-state-department-must-stop-rohingya-ethnic-cleansing-in-burma-initiate-sending-un-peace-keeping-force#share
Since October 21, organized mobs of Rakhine Buddhist extremist headed by fanatic monks declare campaign to wipe out ethnic Rohingya Muslim from their ancestral land of Minbya, Mrauk-U, Pauktaw, kyaukphy and other part of Burma.The local, state and national government of U Thein Sein are supporting crime against humanity to achieve their dream of Muslim free Arakan and Burma.
Many innocent Rohingya Muslim lives and properties in danger due to systematic preplanned process of ethnic cleansing in Arakan Burma. United States and World and all Muslims have moral responsibility to save the lives of innocent people from the inhumane cruelty by the majority Buddhist towards minority Rohingya.United States must send clear signal to Buddhist religious extremist as well as government that USA will never tolerate ethnic cleansing and genocide in Burma.
USA must initiate sending UN peace keeping forces since Majority of Buddhist population and President of Burma are openly asking to expel Rohingya minority out of their ancestral land of Arakan Burma. Without international peace keeping force, more than 1.5 million Rohingya population will be extinct very soon due to mob attack, starvation, physical, psychological, emotional suffering from various kinds of abuses by security forces.
Since October 21, organized mobs of Rakhine Buddhist extremist headed by fanatic monks declare campaign to wipe out ethnic Rohingya Muslim from their ancestral land of Minbya, Mrauk-U, Pauktaw, kyaukphy and other part of Burma.The local, state and national government of U Thein Sein are supporting crime against humanity to achieve their dream of Muslim free…
santa clara, CA44m
Sheffield, United Kingdom9h
Prague, Czech Republic9h
Reasons for Signing
- Min Thit
Mandalay, MyanmarIt is heading to civil war in Myanmar.
- Nurul Islam
Chittagong, BangladeshTo enable surviving Rohingyas from the hands of Rakhines and Myanmar security forces
- jitka pekarkova
Prague, Czech RepublicI support only peaceful ways and measures, and more likely by the UN, like the UNHCR, not U.S. separately. This must not be misused for the Western interests.
- mohammad anwar
jeddah, Saudi Arabiabecause myanmar goverment and rakhine goverment are state terrorism.please peace loving people around world save myanmar muslims from massacre.
- iris ledesma
mar del plata, Argentinapor la cruel injusticia que viola los derechos y sostiene los silencios..
- Anowar Chowdhury
Doha, QatarI do not support any type of killing of an religion
- syed rashid akhtar
doha, Qatarits a matter of muslims being harassed.
- Tipu Sultan
Taxila, PakistanKilling a human being is killing of all humanity. So have dare to speak against the oppressor is sign of faith. so speak on all floors and Truth have to win and light have to come.
- fizza ahmad
lahore, Pakistanits our duty that’s why
- adeel qureshi
karachi, Pakistanethnic killing should be stopped 😦
- mohammed rezuwan
ansan, Korea, Republic ofstop rohingya ethnic cleansing in myanmar
- Kamal Koldounn
Paris, FranceConfessional freedom is one of The fondamental human rigths
- Ahsan Khan
Islamabad, PakistanHumanity, Atrocities and bloodshed should be stop immediately against Muslims.
- ali sadeghi
Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic ofUnited terrorist states of america behind all of these crimes. İts obvipus from their censored media.
- ahmet paksoy
Nif, TurkeyNot US but UN must take action against it. US is perpetrator of this crime. US gave green light for massacre after normalizing ties with Myanmar gov.
- Paul Deakin
Douglas, Isle of ManThis is state supported genocide
- Laila Isti Qomah
Palangkaraya, IndonesiaEveryone has right to live and to hold their religion according to what they believe. No one can take peoples’ right.
- Ahmed Alaraibi
Brisbane, AustraliaDeadly massacres and signs of genocide that is committed against the Rohingya ethnic in Burma. INITIATE SENDING UN PEACE KEEPING FORCE!
- Need Justice
Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaKilling 100 people in one day is not humanity ! When you can speak against terrorism than why #UN #USA is silent here? You should speak about ‘INNOCENT’ people who are getting killed.
- William Jones
Carmarthen, United KingdomThe world must intervene to stop the killing of the rohingya
- Ibrahim Mohammad
Mikkeli, FinlandBecause I’m an Rohingya. Brmeses gov and Rakhine are killing and burnning Rohingya’s villages. stop mass killing. UN should immediate peace keeping troops.
- Rachel Belward
York, United Kingdom“Never again” has to mean something.
- abdul munaf
Japansolve rohingyas problem.
- AMIR HAKIM
seoul, Korea, Republic ofsave rohingya by UN
- shawkhin yunus
medan, Indonesiai agree to send UNHCR peace keeping force to arkan state in myanmar
- mohammed ishaque
seoul, Korea, Republic ofurgent need un force to save rohingya.
- Mayu Khin
Yangon, MyanmarHelp the Rohingya, save the Rohingya, please, please, please.
- Maaung Hla Abu bakar
yango, MyanmarPlease send UN forces to Arakan to save Rohingya.
- Nouman Abulkasim
Jeddah, Saudi Arabiai need urgent UN Security force to send in Arakan state to save Rohingya Muslim.
- Mr Annawarr Husein
Yangon, MyanmarUrgent help our Rohingya Muslims , please. We are humans. Save us .
- Dr Kyaw Zeyar Win
Yangon, MyanmarBecause I’m Rohingya as well as human.The only reason for such ethnic cleaning on Rohingya is “We are Muslims” . We almost ran out of our voices by asking help. If no action was taken to stop this ethnic cleansing, all our people would have disappeared from Arakan sooner or later.
- mohammad anwar
jeddah, Saudi Arabiafor human right
because there are a lot of rohingya muslims killing by rakhine terrorist and myanmar state terrorism.please help minority muslims in myanmar.myanmar government is like animals.please please please help muslims
- mohammad anwar
jeddah, Saudi Arabiarohingya is my life
- Nora Rowley
La Grange, ILSave lives and bring peace to long persecuted and abused fellow human brings
- Yasmine Ara
London, United KingdomBecause I’m rohingya as well as human. We almost ran out of our voices by asking help. If no action was taken to stop this ethnic cleansing, all our people would have disappeared from Arakan sooner or later.
- Sazaat Ahammed
Amsterdam, NetherlandsHuman Rights is for everyone in everywhere. Such inhumane cruelty must not be tolerated! In 21st century State Organized ethnic cleansing must not be tolerated! UN says Rohingya the most persecuted group on this Earth! President Thein Sein said ” Rohingya must be excluded or put in the camp under the coaching of UNHCR. Is this not enough evidence to stop Burmese authorities from Cleansing/Genociding an ethnic group? The question is who will take this step? A> Only US together with EU. Every human-being has obligation to stop this cruelty, but not everyone has the same power. Thus, the world leading countries in all, particularly in Human Rights; United State of America and The European Union can stop, should stop and must stop for the sake of the word “Human Rights”. Otherwise the USA and EU made “Word” “Human Rights” will regret forever.
- Chetan Patel
Forest Hills, NYGovernment is responsible for protecting rights of minority in any country. In case of Burma, Rohingya are being prosecuted and driven away from their home while Burmese government stands by idly, which is unacceptable.
- Muhammad Iqbal
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysiato save Rohingya’s life and properties!
- Asma Jaan
Waterloo, CanadaEthics live with respect to the rightness and wrongness of the choices humans make. this people are living 1000 of year they should live with respect.
- David Ullathorne
Weston-super-Mare, United KingdomMany innocent Rohingya Muslim lives and properties in danger due to systematic preplanned process of ethnic cleansing in Arakan state, Burma
- Feraya Ullathorne
Weston-super-Mare, United KingdomThe Burma military regime has gone too far already. We must do whatever we can to stop the extremely horrendous human rights crimes against the Rohingya who are helpless victims of the barbaric Burmese government and the wild Rakine nationalistic extremists.
- Misrah Abu
Portland, ORlives of people
- maung maung
PORTLAND, ORStop ethnic cleansing
- Abdul Jarbar
Portland, ORStop Genocide
- Nur Hasim
Kitchener, CanadaTo save the Rohingya muslim minority in Myanmar
- ismail ansari
Makkah, Saudi Arabiastop Rohinyga ethnic cleansing
- Aziz Nur
Kitchener, CanadaAs they are human beings.
- Kaladan Press Network
Chittagong, Bangladeshto rise the issue to international to save the lives of Burmese Muslim ( Rohingya)
- yusuf Iqbal
Portland,Stop religious persecution
- Free Rohingya Campaign
New York, NYHuman Right
Rohingya: Final Wipe Out?
Please see @Aungaungsittwe and https://plus.google.com/photos/101220847155228357407/albums/5803174743090174673?banner=pwa for more recent images from Burma
Burma Massacre Fears: Reports of Phase II Expulsion of Unwanted Rohingya
Two Rohingya callers report. 90 herded into boat then men shot women raped. 1000 fled into mountains around Sittwe.
The boats with thousands of Rohingya are floating on the water, some have no fuel to go forwards pic.twitter.com/148PDUk3
Kyaukpyu’s Muslim Quarter Razed to the Ground
Noone left in Muslim quarter. All heading to Sittwe in boats, or killed, with weapons such as machetes. Eleven admitted to hospital.
Students call for removal of Rohingya villages
More than 800 students joined a rally to call for an end to “studying with terrorist Bengalis” and for the removal of Muslim villages on the road to the university.
Muslims in Myae Pon are starving, Chief Police Officer Is Leading the Violence
Refugees fear death by starvation.Reports that Police Chief Thar San is leading the killing.
Police accused of provocation in Burma violence
A Burmese Muslim politician says local police in Burma’s Rakhine state are instigating violence
Violence in Arakan Spread to Kyaut Taw Today
At 6:30 AM, Rakhines have started burning down houses at Lat Saung Kaut village. Those fleeing the area were shot by the Rakhine Army. local witness reports 7 deaths.
Three Ferries Carrying Muslim Refugees Were Attacked in Arakan: Many Died
3 ferries reported as attacked the previous day, and victims including women chopped up. One 10 year old boy escaped.
Setting fire and killing Rohingyas resumes in Kyauk Taw
Burning of 20 houses began at 5.30am whilst Muslims praying in the mosque. Two shot dead, one seriously injured.
Ultimatum issued to get out of houses by 25th October
Security in Pak Taw Township Now Uncertain
Village told by secuirty forces they could not be protected. Seven men went to hire ferries to help villagers escape but the Rakhines arrested them. ‘Since they are in Rakhines’ hands, they won’t come alive. Their bodies won’t even come back.’
News of Rohingya in Pauktaw, Mre Bon and Kaukphyu Tsp
Rohingyas Float Dead in River As Fish
More than 40 boats of Rohingyas float in the river
Not Expecting to See Sunlight – 2000 Rohingya Await Death
In Minbya, the only remaining Rohingya village, Lombaichar, has 850 Rohingya homes which are now completely encircled by a 7,000 strong Rakhine force. 2000 remaining Rohingya do not expect to see sunlight.
Above article ‘expressed fear that Kyauk Pru island town has been comletely over-run – leaving 10,000 displaced after all houses were razed and burnt to ashes’. That’s got to be good news for this project about to begin:
300 Trapped Awaiting Death
Other than death, other options seem completely unlikely.
Hundreds Killed and Thousands of Homes Destroyed in Arakan State
Burma’s Rohingya face ‘new wave of violence’
Latest News on Rakhine Terror in Arakan State (Oct 24 @ 11: 30AM)
Rakhine Student Union in Sittwe to Remove Muslims from Villages and Schools
Burma clashes spread to new districts
Even the government says 1,000 homes have been burnt (so it must be bad!)
Anti-Muslim Hate Letters Spreading in Yangon Outskirts
Hate letters are now being distributed by the Patriotic Youth Network with propaganda to turn people against the Rohingya Muslims
More than 800 houses burn out in Minbya and Maruk-U
Rohingya Unrest Continues – 100 killed
Rakhine Terroristsand RNDP Party are Meeting in Mrauk Oo and Minbya Tsps for Further Killing of Rohingya
Detailed report of atrocities Rohingya in Burma up to 23rd Oct
16 Oct Demonstration Against Muslim Office: Monks Whipped Up in the Hatred (preparation for massacre?)
Leaked video footage from June 2012
Remember Rohingya, a Restless Beings Report
So as I continue, you might understand what I’m trying to put across, and I’ll also tell you what evoked me to write this.
The first word revealed of the Qur’an that was revealed was, was “Iqra” “READ! Seek knowledge! Educate yourselves! Be educated.”
“Seeking knowledge is an obligation upon every Muslim.” (Narrated by Ibn Majah) It’s not only a basic human right, but also an obligation for Muslim parents to educate their children.
“Acquire knowledge even if you may have to go to China for it.” [Narrated by al-Bazzar in al-Musnad, 1:175 §95.]
Is China a Muslim country? No. But for the sake of knowledge, this should justify that studying abroad should be permissible. Does this sound unfair?
“Allah Almighty makes the path to paradise easier for him who walks on it for getting knowledge.” [Narrated by Muslim in al-Sahih, 4:2074 §2699.]
In Islam, we are allowed to raise our voice against oppression. We are obliged to.
Having vaguely made my first point, I’m just getting to main the main point
Just keep up with me…
You may get the gist, I still haven’t explained why I said what I said in the beginning. I’ll explain everything. I’ll begin with what triggered this. This has been stirring up in me- how things are getting sour with Muslims regarding non- Muslims and vice versa and now, the incident regarding the attack on Malala Yousafzai; I’ve been praying for her well-being all along. The Taliban claim to do have done it; and that it’s permissible in the Shariah law. So anyone calls and claims it and it is believed? It’s known for a fact that the Taliban NEVER kill women and children, since they believe themselves to be very virtuous. They would never blow up mosques. I don’t know who did it. But they’re not Muslims. Now, it’s said that it’s according to the Shariah Law. Well, they’re WRONG. No Muslim can ever do such a thing. Muslims are not terrorists. Terrorists are terrorists. A lot of insulting things are being said about Islam. What is being made of the beautiful religion I follow? I demand respect, at least from those who seek knowledge like I do. NO religion promotes violence. And as much as people would say how Islam is unfair to women, they should do some research from non-biased sources and ask Muslim women, those who are not oppressed by a law, culture or men in the name of Islam. Ask me.
The bombings in Afghanistan, the drones over Pakistan, the 9/11 incident… it disheartens me to think of it. The unfairness and discrimination towards Muslims in the Western world, the hate stirring up for the US in the Muslim community-
I just want to tell everyone that no religion promotes such discrimination. TERRORISTS HAVE NO RELIGION.
In my mother tongue, Pushto, Taliban means students. It hurts me, when I see the word being used to describe inhumane people. Humanity comes first in Islam. Aren’t we all seeking knowledge? Aren’t we all students? It’s ridiculous when people say women in Islam are discouraged from education.
“Acquisition of knowledge is binding on all Muslims, for both men
*and women without any discrimination. “[Narrated by Ibn Maja in al-Sunan,* 1:81 §224.]
‘A’isha al-Siddiqa, mother of the faithful, was a hadith-narrator, scholar, intellectual and jurist of great standing. She is believed to have reported 2,210 traditions, outnumbering those reported by men.
Hazrat Khadija, our Prophet’s first wife, was a successful businesswoman.
It is related in the books of sira that women were part of the parliament (majlis al-shura) during the period of ‘Umar b. al-Khattab (may Allah be well pleased with him). [Narrated by ‘Abd al-Razzaq in al-Musannaf, 6:180 §10420.] During the rule of ‘Uthman (may Allah be well pleased with him), women were designated as ambassadors to other countries. [Related by al-Tabari in Tarikh al-Umam wa al-Muluk, 2:601.]
Christians don’t hate Jews. Muslims don’t hate Christians. Whites don’t hate Blacks. The rich don’t hate the poor. Races don’t hate races.
HATERS HATE. The world is unfair. And I don’t want anyone to spoil our harmony we can have.
I want peace. And the more people who get together in this humble action, the more we can revive humanity and diminish hate. It’s as simple as that. Stop hating. Stop judging. Let’s come together. Let’s spread the love by sharing.
Religion is not the cause of corruption and violence. PEOPLE are. They use religion as an excuse,
OUR REACTION TO ALL THIS SHOULD BE JIHAD.
Jihad has the literal meaning of exerting our best and greatest effort to achieve something. It’s what I do every day. It’s what everyone can do.
To fight against oppression, to fight against evil, even if it’s evil desires in our hearts. Strive in the way of education and righteousness. This is what the events should motivate us to do.
My dear fellow Muslims and fellow human beings,
This is Jihad.
Assalamualaikum(may peace be upon you).
Islam is the religion of all Prophets, Adam to Muhammad. Children are not born out of any sin, original, inherited or derived. They are born on the religion of their nature, i.e., Islam.
The Prophet Muhammad said, “No babe is born but upon Fitra (as a Muslim). It is his parents who make him a Jew or a Christian or a Polytheist.” (Sahih Muslim, Book 033, Number 6426)
RECOGNITION OF ALLAH
The question which arises here is, “How can all people be expected to believe in Allah given their varying- backgrounds, societies and cultures? For people to be responsible for worshipping Allah they all have to have access to knowledge of Allah. The final revelation teaches that all mankind have the recognition of Allah imprinted on their souls, a part of their very nature with which they are created.
In Surrah Al-A’raaf, Verses 172-173; Allah explained that when He created Adam, He caused all of Adam’s descendants to come into existence and took a pledge from them saying, Am I not your Lord? To which they all replied, ” Yes, we testify to It:’
Allah then explained why He had all of mankind bear witness that He is their creator and only true God worthy of worship. He said, “That was In case you (mankind) should say on the day of Resurrection, “Verily we were unaware of all this.” That is to say, we had no idea that You Allah, were our God. No one told us that we were only supposed to worship You alone. Allah went on to explain That it was also In case you should say, “Certainly It was our ancestors who made partners (With Allah) and we are only their descendants; will You then destroy us for what those liars did?” Thus, every child is born with a natural belief in Allah and an inborn inclination to worship Him alone called in Arabic the “Fitrah”.
If the child were left alone, he would worship Allah in his own way, but all children are affected by those things around them, seen or unseen.
The Prophet (PBUH) reported that Allah said, “I created my servants in the right religion but devils made them go astray”. The Prophet (PBUH) also said, “Each child is born in a state of “Fitrah”, then his parents make him a Jew, Christian or a Zoroastrian, the way an animal gives birth to a normal offspring. Have you noticed any that were born mutilated?” (Collected by Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim).
So, just as the child submits to the physical laws which Allah has put in nature, his soul also submits naturally to the fact that Allah is his Lord and Creator. But, his parents try to make him follow their own way and the child is not strong enough in the early stages of his life to resist or oppose the will of his parents. The religion which the child follows at this stage is one of custom and upbringing and Allah does not hold him to account or punish him for this religion. (By Abu Ameena Bilal Phillips )
No sunni No shia! We are united Muslims
Let me just start out by saying this, it is a mistake(in my opinion) to call ourselves Sunni or Shia.
“It is He (Allah) who has named you MUSLIMS..” [22:78]
“And how would you disbelieve, while unto you are recited the Verses of Allah, and among you is His Messenger (Muhammad SAW)? And whoever holds firmly to Allah, (i.e. follows Islam Allah’s Religion, and obeys all that Allah has ordered, practically), then he is indeed guided to a Right Path.
O you who believe! Fear Allah (by doing all that He has ordered and by abstaining from all that He has forbidden) as He should be feared. [Obey Him, be thankful to Him, and remember Him always], and die not except in a state of Islam (as Muslims) with complete submission to Allah.
And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allah (i.e. this Qur’an), and be not divided among yourselves, and remember Allah’s Favor on you, for you were enemies one to another but He joined your hearts together, so that, by His Grace, you became brethren (in Islamic Faith), and you were on the brink of a pit of Fire, and He saved you from it. Thus Allah makes His Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.,) clear to you, that you may be guided.
And hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together and do not become divided. And remember the favor of Allah upon you – when you were enemies and He brought your hearts together and you became, by His favor, brothers. And you were on the edge of a pit of the Fire, and He saved you from it. Thus does Allah make clear to you His verses that you may be guided.
Let there arise out of you a group of people inviting to all that is good (Islam), enjoining Al-Ma’ruf (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to do) and forbidding Al-Munkar (polytheism and disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden). And it is they who are the successful.
And be not as those who divided and differed among themselves after the clear proofs had come to them. It is they for whom there is an awful torment.” [Quran 3:100 – 3:105]
“As for those who Divide their Religion and Break up into Sects, thou hast no part in them in the least: their affair is with Allah. He will in the end tell them the Truth of all that they did.” [Quran 6:159]
Do the words; ‘Islam’ and ‘Muslim’ appear in the scripture of Islam [Quran]?”
We as Muslims, have been instructed in the Quran itself to resolve any of our differences according to these two sources or otherwise to be considered as non-believers, by our Lord. As He has mentioned in the Quran: “But no, by your Lord, they can have no faith until they make you [Muhammad] as a judge between them in all their disputes, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept with full submission [Islam].” [An Nisaa’ 4:65] It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in plain error.” [Al Ahzab 33:36]
This is the best one i guess and reason and after effects we all are fully aware. What all is happening is the only reason we did to us by fighting and divisions when Holy Quran:
Root cause of all issues of this ERA for Muslims.
Yet you can see what they did after Khilafah:
Divided Muslims in such a way that they can never unit and Majority of Muslim are never let to be part of government and if someone is in state affairs he will be one with weak believes or not a strong Muslim.
Sorry to say : We gain our colors,caste, custom and sects but we are far away from the Muslim: The one Muslim who is told and expressed his Qualities in all Holy Books and Especially the final and the Correct version Holy Quran. Our Hard time which we are seeing are our deeds but also said in Ahadis/Hadith like:
Volume 1, Book 3, Number 122 :
Narrated by Jarir
The Prophet said to me during Hajjat-al-Wida’: Let the people keep quiet and listen. Then he said (addressing the people), “Do not (become infidels) revert to disbelief after me by striking the necks (cutting the throats) of one another (Killing each other).”
Its all truth and time is Proving it and also proven by Hadith.
Volume 9, Book 88, Number 183 : Narrated by Abu Huraira The Prophet said, “Time will pass rapidly, good deeds will decrease, miserliness will be thrown (in the hearts of the people) afflictions will appear and there will be much ‘Al-Harj.” They said, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is “Al-Harj?” He said, “Killing! Killing!” (See Hadith No. 63, Vol. 8)
The only word mentioned is Muslim in Holy Quran and Hadith, So if you say something to everyone Talk on some ground. We are all Muslims and Muhammad PBUH said Muslim. Stay united and do not making things on our own like in all previous nations they were use to say we found our ancestors doing this and that so if any Muslim, can not authenticate some sect from Holy Quran and hadith kindly do not follow it and Stay Muslim of Holy Quran and Muhammad PBUH preached and practiced all life.